FILTER RESULTS
FILTER RESULTS
close.svg
Search Result for “political”

Showing 1 - 6 of 6

Image-Content

OPINION

Adam Smith 300 years later

Oped, Published on 30/06/2023

» This year marks the 300th anniversary of the birth of Adam Smith, the founding father of modern economics. It comes at a time when the global economy faces several daunting challenges.

Image-Content

BUSINESS

Asian trade subdued as economic outlook weakens

Business, Published on 13/05/2023

» RECAP: Most Asian share markets were subdued on Friday and the dollar held onto its gains from safe-haven flows, after soft economic data from the US and China fuelled concerns about a global slowdown.

Image-Content

BUSINESS

Chief Executives Give Dueling Visions of the Future of Work

Business, Published on 07/05/2022

» The CEO of Airbnb Inc. is certain that the ideal work schedule is no more than two days in the office. The head of Morgan Stanley said no fewer than three days a week will do.

Image-Content

BUSINESS

Gates Questions Musk's Goals for Twitter, Approach to Misinformation

Business, Published on 06/05/2022

» Bill Gates said that he isn't sure of Elon Musk's motives in buying Twitter Inc. and that social media must play a role in curbing the spread of misinformation.

Image-Content

BUSINESS

Restoring respect

Asia focus, Nareerat Wiriyapong, Published on 07/06/2021

» Patama Chantaruck still remembers an unsettling encounter she experienced during her early days of living in the United States 28 years ago.

Image-Content

TECH

Don't call AI bigoted

Life, James Hein, Published on 06/11/2019

» Despite what some claim, Artificial Intelligence is not racist. Google built a system to detect hate speech or speech that exhibited questionable content. Following the rules given, it picked out a range of people with what some try to claim was a bias toward black people. Wrong. The AI simply followed the rules and a larger number of black people and some other minorities, as defined in the US, were found to be breaking those rules. It didn't matter to the machines that when one group says it, it isn't defined as hate speech by some; it simply followed the rules. People can ignore or pretend not to see rules, but machines don't work that way. What the exercise actually found was that speech by some groups is ignored while the same thing said by others isn't. As the saying goes, don't ask the question if you're not prepared to hear the answer.