FILTER RESULTS
FILTER RESULTS
close.svg
Search Result for “Pareena Kraikupt”

Showing 1 - 10 of 16

Image-Content

OPINION

Appraising the PM

Oped, Postbag, Published on 30/08/2022

» Re: "PM pressured over defence role", (BP, Aug 26).

Image-Content

OPINION

Poor 'renegades'

Oped, Postbag, Published on 16/06/2022

» Re: "Pheu Thai 'renegades' face chop", (BP, June 5).

OPINION

Landed interest

News, Postbag, Published on 29/05/2022

» Re: "Dems swoop on Pareena's House seat," (BP, May 23).

OPINION

The business of MPs

News, Postbag, Published on 18/03/2021

» So the National Anti-Corruption Commission has suggested, without any apparent irony, that MP Pareena Kraikupt has "violated ethical standards expected from a lawmaker", (BP, March 17).

Image-Content

OPINION

A knee-jerk reaction

Oped, Postbag, Published on 13/02/2021

» I take a somewhat different view from that of David Brown in his Feb 11 letter on what Australia's reaction to the latest Myanmar coup should be.

Image-Content

OPINION

NACC takes the lead

Oped, Postbag, Published on 12/02/2021

» The NACC is to be highly praised for its courage in finding Palang Pracharath Party MP Pareena Kraikupt guilty of extreme ethical misconduct for having a 771-rai poultry farm in a national forest (BP, Feb 11).

Image-Content

OPINION

Imperfect preaching

Oped, Postbag, Published on 19/11/2020

» Yes, the PM "often preaches about upholding the highest moral standards".

Image-Content

OPINION

Buddhist disconnect

Oped, Postbag, Published on 06/11/2020

» Re: "Putting virtues first", (Opinion, Nov 6).

Image-Content

OPINION

A silly syllabus

Oped, Postbag, Published on 04/11/2020

» Former Education Minister Somsak Prissananantakul favours providing students with a better understanding of history (BP, Nov 3), so long as a process known as chamra prawattisat be undertaken, in which academics with differing opinions come together to agree on a standard interpretation. This proposal sums up much of what is wrong with Thai education, and perhaps Thai culture as well. Why have a standard interpretation of history? So it can be crammed down students' throats for later regurgitation on command? History is like a photograph. It captures events from a specific angle, with a specific depth of field, and perhaps through various filters. Why not expose students to multiple interpretations and let them, through discussion, identify the biases in each and, in the process, develop critical thinking skills?

Image-Content

OPINION

Great example

Oped, Postbag, Published on 02/11/2020

» On Friday, Thairath hosted a debate on today's hottest topic: the nationwide student protests demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha, among other things. Having watched the US presidential debates and the Thairath debate, I can confidently say that I learned a lot more from the Thai debate than either of the US debates.