FILTER RESULTS
FILTER RESULTS
close.svg
Search Result for “Future Forward Party”

Showing 1 - 10 of 29

OPINION

Myanmar solution

Postbag, Published on 11/08/2024

» Re: "Junta says Shan pullback meant 'for safety of people'", (BP, Aug 7).

Image-Content

OPINION

Energised escape

Oped, Postbag, Published on 06/07/2024

» Re: "Red Bull clan leads rich list", (BP, July 4).

Image-Content

OPINION

Root for city workers

Oped, Postbag, Published on 03/02/2024

» Re: "High-perched garbos killed as truck enters underpass", (BP, Jan 24).

OPINION

Down with the devil

Postbag, Published on 20/08/2023

» Re: "Group says statue promotes devil worship", (BP, Aug 18).

Image-Content

OPINION

No to dictatorship

News, Published on 26/06/2023

» Re: "Thailand's policy on Myanmar stinks," (BP, June 23).

OPINION

Foolish pride

News, Postbag, Published on 21/05/2023

» Re: "MFP victory one for the history books", (Opinion, May 20).

Image-Content

OPINION

Be a good sport

Oped, Postbag, Published on 19/05/2023

» Re: "Pride of the nation", (Editorial, May 18).

Image-Content

OPINION

What the polls say

Oped, Postbag, Published on 06/05/2023

» Re: "MFP closing gap with Pheu Thai: Nida", (BP, May 4).

Image-Content

OPINION

United? It already is

Oped, Postbag, Published on 08/08/2020

» Re: "We must stay united, says PM", (BP, Aug 7).

Image-Content

OPINION

FFP was singled out

Oped, Postbag, Published on 14/03/2020

» Re: "It's not just about FFP", (PostBag, March 12). Khun Piya Samyan defends the Constitutional Court dissolving the Future Forward Party, because "it did violate the law regarding acquisition of income". This is about the "rule of law that is equally applied to all". I fully agree with Khun Piya that the law must be applied without fear or favour -- for if not, the government would be weaponising the law to slay its enemies, so to speak.