FILTER RESULTS
FILTER RESULTS
close.svg
Search Result for “Physics”

Showing 1 - 5 of 5

OPINION

Marking time at the COP30 climate summit

Oped, Gwynne Dyer, Published on 12/11/2025

» Populist parties are already in power in some developed countries and waiting just outside the door in many more. The key trick of populist politicians is to tell the voters what they want to hear, and the voters definitely do not want their lives to be disrupted by global heating, so they are told it is not happening. It's "the world's biggest con", in Donald Trump's words.

OPINION

Will we soon have unlimited clean energy?

Oped, Gwynne Dyer, Published on 17/12/2022

» Nuclear fusion, the "holy grail" that would finally end all the world's energy problems, has been receding into the future at the rate of about one year per year all my adult life -- it was always "about 30 years away" -- but suddenly we're catching up. Unfortunately, the change of pace comes too late to save us from an acute global climate emergency.

OPINION

The bug-eyed monster search needs discussion

News, Gwynne Dyer, Published on 31/07/2019

» 'There is absolutely no procedure enshrined in international law to respond to a signal from an alien civilisation," said Martin Dominik, an astronomer at the University of St Andrews. "It makes sense to create a legally binding framework that is properly rooted in international law."

OPINION

On climate change, take risks or pay the price

News, Gwynne Dyer, Published on 20/12/2018

» Global warming is physics and chemistry, and you can't negotiate with science for more time to solve the problem: more emissions mean a hotter planet. Dealing with the problem, however, requires an international negotiation involving almost 200 countries. In big gatherings of that sort, the convoy always moves at the speed of the slowest ships.

OPINION

Fear of being blunt clouds climate issue

News, Gwynne Dyer, Published on 13/10/2018

» They still haven't dropped the other shoe. The 'Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 Celsius contains terrifying forecasts about what will happen when we reach an average global temperature one-and-a-half degrees Celsius higher than the pre-industrial average. (We are now at +1C.) But it still shies away from talking about the feedbacks, the refugees, and mass death.