FILTER RESULTS
FILTER RESULTS
close.svg
Search Result for “emission reduction”

Showing 1 - 9 of 9

OPINION

Climate change discourse takes a new turn

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 09/02/2026

» What a difference a single year makes. The once-dominant push to radically reshape society to avert climate catastrophe has collapsed. Look at Davos -- the talkfest long dominated by climate advocacy. That consensus has been abandoned by its once strongest proponents.

OPINION

COP30 must be more focused on human welfare

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 13/11/2025

» With the United Nations climate summit, COP30, now in full swing in the humid jungle city of Belém, Brazil, Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates has cut through the noise with a blunt truth: these UN climate gatherings must zero in on lifting human lives, rather than fixating solely on slashing emissions or dialling down global temperatures. It's a perspective that's long overdue yet seems so obvious.

OPINION

What climate spending really costs the globe

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 24/01/2025

» Across the world, public finances are stretched dangerously thin. Per person growth continues dropping while costs are climbing for pensions, education, healthcare, and defence. These urgent priorities could easily require an additional 3-6% of GDP. Yet green campaigners are loudly calling for governments to spend up to 25% of our GDP choking growth in the name of climate change.

OPINION

Pricey policies to curb climate change 'dead'

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 28/11/2024

» The latest climate summit has been as hypocritical and dysfunctional as every one before, with most world leaders not even bothering to turn up. Still, 50,000 people flew in from across the world, while essentially telling the rest of us to stop flying. Poor-country politicians performatively staged a "walk-out", and rich nations ended up promising a climate slush fund of US$300 billion (about 10 trillion baht) a year.

OPINION

Climate policies are getting far too expensive

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 02/11/2024

» As climate policy increasingly drives up living costs with next to no results, voters are becoming wearier of expansive green promises. We can only hope this backlash could lead to better, cheaper and more effective measures.

OPINION

Rich world raids development funds for climate

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 27/01/2024

» Too many rich-world politicians and climate campaigners forget that much of the world remains mired in poverty and hunger. Yet, rich countries are increasingly replacing their development aid with climate spending. The World Bank, whose primary goal is to help people out of poverty, has now announced it will divert 45% of its funding toward climate change, shifting some US$40 billion annually away from poverty and hunger.

OPINION

Why malaria still persists in much of Africa

News, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 12/06/2023

» We think of malaria as a problem faced only by humid, hot countries. But just over a century ago, the disease thrived as far north as Siberia and the Arctic Circle, and was endemic in 36 states of the US. We don't have specific data that far back for Thailand, but back then, malaria is estimated to have killed 2.5 million people each year in the Western Pacific, Middle East and South Asia.

OPINION

Reducing emissions not so easy

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 10/11/2021

» At the UN Climate Summit in Glasgow (COP26), most leaders of rich nations are eagerly promising to decarbonise their economies by mid-century or even sooner. Yet, it is highly questionable if they and their successors will want or be able to keep their promise. Even worse, growth-reducing climate policies won't convince developing countries who need to lift their populations out of poverty and whose emissions matter most this century.

OPINION

Shifting climate costs to the world's poor

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 28/05/2021

» To tackle climate change, rich nations are promising to end fossil fuel use in 29 years. As this becomes excruciatingly costly, the G7 is now thinking about making the world's poor pay for it. That will go badly.