FILTER RESULTS
FILTER RESULTS
close.svg
Search Result for “Greenhouse gas reduction”

Showing 1 - 10 of 14

OPINION

Climate change discourse takes a new turn

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 09/02/2026

» What a difference a single year makes. The once-dominant push to radically reshape society to avert climate catastrophe has collapsed. Look at Davos -- the talkfest long dominated by climate advocacy. That consensus has been abandoned by its once strongest proponents.

OPINION

COP30 must be more focused on human welfare

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 13/11/2025

» With the United Nations climate summit, COP30, now in full swing in the humid jungle city of Belém, Brazil, Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates has cut through the noise with a blunt truth: these UN climate gatherings must zero in on lifting human lives, rather than fixating solely on slashing emissions or dialling down global temperatures. It's a perspective that's long overdue yet seems so obvious.

OPINION

Environment on the up as world prospers

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 22/04/2025

» As we celebrate Earth Day today, it's tempting to believe that the world is on the brink of environmental collapse. We are constantly inundated by dire predictions of climate catastrophe and warnings about the planet's imminent destruction. But this is misleading. Rather than panic, we should take a moment to appreciate the remarkable progress we've made in improving the environment -- and acknowledge that a key factor is prosperity.

OPINION

Climate debate is being silenced by the UN's bias

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 14/03/2025

» The United Nations is at a crossroads. US President Donald Trump pulled out of the World Health Organization (WHO), cut funding for the UN's Climate Convention, and more withdrawals are likely. He calls the UN an "underperformer", suggesting it is a swamp to be drained.

OPINION

What climate spending really costs the globe

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 24/01/2025

» Across the world, public finances are stretched dangerously thin. Per person growth continues dropping while costs are climbing for pensions, education, healthcare, and defence. These urgent priorities could easily require an additional 3-6% of GDP. Yet green campaigners are loudly calling for governments to spend up to 25% of our GDP choking growth in the name of climate change.

OPINION

Climate policies are getting far too expensive

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 02/11/2024

» As climate policy increasingly drives up living costs with next to no results, voters are becoming wearier of expansive green promises. We can only hope this backlash could lead to better, cheaper and more effective measures.

OPINION

The transition to green energy that wasn't

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 06/09/2024

» Despite much hype, the much-vaunted green energy transition away from fossil fuels isn't happening. Achieving a meaningful shift with current policies turns out to be unaffordably costly. We need to drastically change policy direction.

OPINION

Eyeing climate change, follow science, warily

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 06/06/2024

» We endlessly hear the flawed assertion that because climate change is real, we should "follow the science" and end fossil fuel use. We hear this claim from politicians who favour swift carbon cuts, and from natural scientists themselves, as when the editor-in-chief of Nature insists "The science is clear -- fossil fuels must go".

OPINION

Politicising novel solutions to climate change

News, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 13/05/2024

» Climate studies are increasingly becoming politicised. Harvard University recently shut down a key geoengineering research project because of intense backlash, despite the college's aspiration to become "a global beacon for climate change."

OPINION

Why solar and wind are not winning

Oped, Bjorn Lomborg, Published on 20/04/2024

» Despite us constantly being told that solar and wind are now the cheapest forms of electricity, governments around the world needed to spend US$1.8 trillion (66.3 trillion baht) on the green transition last year. "Wind and solar are already significantly cheaper than coal and oil" is how US President Joe Biden conveniently justifies spending hundreds of billions of dollars on green subsidies. Indeed, arguing that wind and solar is cheapest is a meme employed by green lobbyists, activists and politicians around the world. Unfortunately, as the $1.8 trillion price-tag shows, the claim is wildly deceptive.